Comparative study of Candida auris mannan from cultivation on Shibata and YPD medium

Comparative study of Candida auris mannan from cultivation on Shibata and YPD medium

Sekcia: 
Rok:
2023

Celkové hodnotenie

Vedecká práca
80%
Prevedenie (dizajn)
76%
Diskusná interakcia
75%
PoužívateľVedecká prácaDizajnDiskusná interakcia
Mgr. Klaudia Híveš Holečková100%100%-
Ing. Zuzana Brnoliaková PhD.100%80%100%
RNDr. Michaela Abrahamovská100%100%100%
ISBN: 978-80-974608-0-8

Comparative study of Candida auris mannan from cultivation on Shibata and YPD medium

Apoorva Soni1,2 , Romana Vrzoňová3 , Pavol Farkaš
1 Institute of Biochemistry and Microbiology, FCHPT STU in Bratislava
2 Institute of Chemistry SAS, Department of Glycobiotechnology
3 Institute of Chemistry SAS, Department of Glycomaterials
chemsoni@savba.sk

Introduction: Candida auris is an emerging pathogen that causes nosocomial infections and is regarded as a significant global health concern. It was discovered as a new Candida species in 2009 and has since been isolated in 35 nations, except for Antarctica [1]. C. auris can cause invasive infections with a high mortality rate. It is a multi-drug resistant species with various resistance patterns to multiple antifungal drugs often used to treat other Candida infections. The growing incidence of infection and colonization with non-albicans Candida species in recent years is assumed to be owing to the overuse of prophylactic antifungals such as fluconazole. Laboratory yeast identification methods frequently misidentify C. auris as other yeasts, making discovering and treating this pathogen challenging. Candida auris transmission occurs in nosocomial settings, even when infection prevention and control measures are in place [2]. C. auris mannan differs from other pathogenic Candida species in its abundance of β-1,2-Man-linkages. The mannans are potent immunogens, and as such, the structure of the mannans and their epitopes have significant relevance to pathogenesis.

Aim: The presented work aims to analyze the changes in the structure of C. auris mannan from cultivation at 37 ºC in Shibata and YPD medium. The structure of mannan in C. albicans yeast and hyphal form (the most common morphological state at 37 °C, similar to the human body) is different; we investigate the comparative data, whether the similar structural change of mannan is fundamental for C. auris.

Method: Here, we extracted mannan from C. auris using two different media (Shibata and YPD medium) at 37 ºC. Mannan was isolated from cells using a modified extraction procedure [3]. Thus, the C. auris biomass was suspended in 0.2 M NaCl and autoclaved 3 × 1 h. Each time the supernatant was collected. Then the mannoprotein was precipitated using 3 vol. of EtOH. Pellet was suspended in H₂O and then dialyzed with 2 % KOH. Then the supernatant was saved and subjected to Fehling’s reagent for precipitation. The resulting precipitate was dialyzed again with 3 M HCl and methanol + acetic acid. After the sample was lyophilized, we obtained a product designed as mannan.

Results: As compared to the growth of cells between both media, it is found that the cells grew well in the YPD media. Further, the sample was characterized using NMR and FTIR techniques to analyze the structural changes of mannan within both media. The comparative data in FTIR shows little difference in the quality of mannans. However, mannan characterized from NMR shows under standard cultivation, Manβ1→2Manβ1→2Manα1→2 epitops are appr. 7 % of all mannoses present, but in the case of mannan with Shibata medium, they are 12 %. Manβ1→2Manα1→2 epitopes decreased from 4 % to 2 % for standard mannan. Whereas, in mannan, isolated from YPD, they are 6 %. Also, elemental analysis was done to analyze the amount of carbon, nitrogen, and hydrogen present in the mannan. The mannan extracted from the YPD shows a higher amount of nitrogen in comparison to the Shibata medium.

Conclusion: We concluded that cultivation with Shibata medium at 37 °C makes it challenging to yield an adequate quantity of mannan, whereas, in YPD, the yield was sufficient. The results in NMR indicate that the mannan structure appears similar under all examined conditions, and the differences may be due to the relative number of individual epitopes. We also need to perform GPC-HPLC to see molecular mass variations, among other things. In the future, we will extend our findings with further studies, providing the groundwork for getting previously undiscovered insights into the polysaccharides of C. auris virulence components.

Poďakovanie: 

This work was supported by the Science Grant Agency, project VEGA 2/0094/23. We would like to thank our technician Barbora Alföldyová, and our colleagues, Dr. Iveta Uhliariková and Dr. Michal Šoral, for helping with the experimental work.

Zdroje: 
  1. Satoh, K., Makimura, K., Hasumi, Y., Nishiyama, Y., Uchida, K., & Yamaguchi, H. (2009). Candida aurissp. nov., a novel ascomycetous yeast isolated from the external ear canal of an inpatient in a Japanese hospital. Microbiology and Immunology, 53(1), 41–44.
  2. Deorukhkar, S. C., Saini, S., & Mathew, S. (2014). Non-albicans Candida Infection: An Emerging Threat. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases, 2014, 1–7.
  3. Bruno, M., Kersten, S., Bain, J. M., Jaeger, M., Rosati, D., Kruppa, M. D., Lowman, D. W., Rice, P. J., Graves, B., Ma, Z., Jiao, Y. N., Chowdhary, A., Renieris, G., van de Veerdonk, F. L., Kullberg, B.-J., Giamarellos-Bourboulis, E. J., Hoischen, A., Gow, N. A. R., Brown, A. J. P., Netea, M. G. (2020). Transcriptional and functional insights into the host immune response against the emerging fungal pathogen Candida auris. Nature Microbiology, 5(12), 1516–1531.

Diskusia

Nice and complex methodological work, congratulations to your results. Just being curious, can you compare also the economical aspects: what is the unitary price and availability for YPD and Shibata medium? Thank you in advance for your clarifications, ZB

Thank you for your comment and question. As per my opinion, if we compare the economical aspect of both the media then YPD media is more easily available and he unitary price will be something around 50 euro for 1 L. And for the Shibata medium is also similar. As I have mentioned the composition of both the media in my presentation where you can see that for preparing the Shibata media we have to buy each reagents individually.

I hope I understand your question correctly. If not please let me know.

Thank you.

Thank you for your reply, yes, I just wanted to know if there is something favorizing YPD media in comparison to Shibata´s. Since the price is comparable (as you have mentioned above), at least the preparing procedure differs a bit. All the best for your further research, ZB